What is your take on AI generated content?
In today's Liotes Mission, we would like to talk about AI generated content. I would like you to look at the video to understand in which context I ask this question.
What is your take on AI generated content ? Should we be more open to accept AI generated content on Hive ?
Please leave your answer as a comment below this post.
The Liotes Mission
By taking part in the Liotes missions, you can win credits that will help you to increase your score and your title in the Liotes Ranking.
People who submit an answer will get 3 credits for the Liotes ranking. If you submit more than 1 answer, you will not get more credits.
We are very grateful if you enter the challenge within 24 hours after the post is published. We will try to count entries up to 36 hours after publication.
Liotes
A project run by @ph1102 and @achim03
Resources
▶️ 3Speak
The world is racing forward, and it’s impossible to resist many things for more than a month. I wouldn’t want us to end up as a social network of old people for old people. We already have small (no, big) problems with that.
I’m all for any technologies, including AI for avatars, videos, and the like. Still, scripts and texts will have to be written by ourselves.
!ALIVE
That's a very good point!
iam still ok witht that, but most of the time it is used to generated a video that spread fear that I hate the most, usually in Facebook, or youtube short. If only there will be a standard that will always tag such video as AI generated, so it will be much easier tfor us to detect those kind of content.
!PIZZA !LUV
There is definitely the risk to use AI to disinform and if it's not declared as ai generated content, it can trigger fear and wrong decisions.
$PIZZA slices delivered:
@ekavieka(1/5) tipped @liotes
Send $PIZZA tips in Discord via tip.cc!
As long as the AI is supporting the post and not the main subject, i'm fine with it.
!PIMP
Thanks for your comment!
We are at a time where AI-generated content is becoming a thing. I think it's okay to welcome AI-aided content here, especially for video clips or images.
I see especially in video content a lot of potential for ai supported content. People who don't want to be in front of a camera can create a clone or an avatar that speaks for them. It can be a solution and a way for people to lower the threashold to create content.
I think if it were used sparingly, I wouldn't mind. In fact I would encourage it. However, that is an ideal situation. The reality is most avid users of AI want it to generate the whole video or write the whole article for them while the human sits back with their feet up. It should enhance us, not replace us. If the human were to work alongside the AI, the end result might be a little more cohesive and less sloppy. Perhaps it might even be something of value.
If ai is here to support and facilitate our creativity, I think it's legit. If ai is used as a fully automatized engine that generates content for the sake of generating it, then it's not that great...
We need to embrace it as long as it is stated to be AI content. If someone is passing off AI as their own work I find that dishonest personally. AI is here to stay, and better to take advantage of it as long as there are rules. Pure AI posts shouldn't be rewarded, but I think the content can still be valuable!
We could define a rule that the author rewards of AI post are burnt 90%. Like that the author would still get a small incentive but it would mainly help the token to reduce supply...
That's a great thought, some incentive should be offered to add quality materials to Hive. AI is the way of the future, we can't be trying to race a Ferrari with our current horse and carriage!
AI is the future. Embrace it instead of fighting it. :)
I agree with you :-)
we have authors and curators, whether it is welcomed or not it will be back to the curators.
personally, I am more open to AI with some limitation and understanding, it is part of technology, why would we walk back to the past? every tech has it bad side, we need to adapt and adjust ourselves, not to fight it
I think that's a wise approach!
Personally I don't have issues with AI content, as long as it's meaningful and not spam. Ultimately, it's up to the community to decide who we want to give our upvotes (or even downvotes). If people don't like AI content, they can just ignore, or if they think this person is abusing, they can downvote as well.
That's true. I think the problem in this respect are the automatic upvotes. Somebody creates legit content, get's some vote trails to follow him and then automates the content with ai. That's a problem in my opinion.
Before I listen/watch the video.
I take it !LOLZ
I am using genAI daily and frequently for work and private stuff. And no, I am not using it for publishing on social media platforms! With one exception so far: https://ecency.com/hive-196902/@ervin-lemark/late-checkout
The other question is how many trees do I chop with every chat query... This is something I am not comfortable with.
I totally feel you there...
As long as content created by AI is not pretended to be one's own, I have no problems. But it must be well differentiated, otherwise it seems dishonest and abusive to me.
AI is here to stay and has many advantages. Thanks to it I can understand people who speak other languages, for example. It makes no sense to close ourselves to the evolution of technology, the question is to give it an appropriate and honest use.
I think that this is very important and that's what is done on social medias in general at the moment.
Whenever AI is discussed, I always reiterate one thing: We cannot behave like Luddites here. Or can we? Well, then we/you will end up like some kind of last-days saints.
I often use Deepl, Grammarly, and Google Translate, and I suppose they use AI. Why do I use translators? Because English is not my native language, I want everything I write to be as understandable as possible to others.
I'm very involved in music, and my latest project with Suno is Stoner Now.
https://ecency.com/hive-193816/@seckorama/qdavufpmzz
And that's mine - I have all copyrights to that. And just started to learn AI videos...
Could you have done a music track without ai? I couldn't. Could I create a manga movie without ai, I couldn't... For me Ai can be a facilitator to do things without needing to be a specialist. It can be a tool to do things that weren't possible a couple of months ago. I believe we shoot ourselves in the foot, if we keep pretending ai doesn't exist...
That's exactly what I wrote about. AI helps me expand the boundaries of my own creativity. I always mark the tools I used to create something. Whether it's Photoshop, Gemini, or Grok, it doesn't matter to me. To paraphrase a friend of mine, an artist who, decades ago, said that for him, computers and the internet are "extensions of the human brain." In my opinion, AI tools also fall into this category. Of course, we can debate all of this, but we shouldn't hide.
Or, to quote another sci-fi quote: Resistance is futile. We are the Borg.... 😎
AI to help is good, but not do the whole work. If you are posting an art, posting an image is bad, if you are generating text content, you can use some images just to illustrate but the text should be human generated. I use it to discuss about topics that I am writing about, sometimes it can give me an information that I wasn't aware about a topic.
Ai can be great to do research, give ideas, correct mistakes, translate. The question is, how much of the human should stay in the process?
While the content (pictures, animation, video) can be generate by AI, the script, prompts and all needs to be human instead of AI generated.
Interesting to see this distinction.
I have no problem with using AI as a tool to help improve your content, but I disagree with content generated exclusively with AI.
I think that it's not that easy to draw a line between the two.
Yeah! I get your point and that's why it's so hard to deal with AI for curators here.
I see AI as a tool to help me produce better content. In much the same way as a spell checker, grammar checker, headline generator, etc does. And I applaud YouTube's decision to assist its users with AI.
I think that Hive should adopt similar methods to develop AI etiquette guidelines. Including:
!BBH
Interesting thoughts. What I see is that AI is evolving so fast that nowadays prompts start to be substituted already. In a software like Higsfield you can decide which camera you want, how you want the setting, you can chose which avatar, his voice... It's getting more and more user friendly and easy to make. In my opinion, it's a facilitator for creativity but it's not easy to draw the line what creativity is... When somebody sticks a banana to a wall, it's art...
I believe that AI generated content can be a valuable tool if used responsibly and ethically.
It can bring new perspectives and facilitate creative processes, but it's important to maintain a balance with human created content to preserve authenticity and personal connection.
On Hive, opening up to this type of content could enrich the platform, as long as it's clearly identified as AI generated and transparency is encouraged.
!ALIVE
!BBH
!WINE
Interesting point and nice to see that you are open for change!
I am mixed about it. I have been working with the Microsoft AI CoPilot software on my laptop for various research, calculation and assistance with several programs. I have found the AI generated answers to be very helpful...AT TIMES... The form of the responses indicate or imply a certain level of knowledge. Sometimes it can be very misleading if you don't do your on due diligence on the side.
I believe AI created content can be very artistic but I would not yet trust it for anything of great importance. If the author highlighted that the content was AI generated, I would be fine with that. However I would not be fine with posting that did not acknowledge AI was involved in the contents creation.
I like this distinction. Clear transparency is a must, especially to avoid deep fakes. Platforms like youtube, tiktok or instagram already ask users to identify AI generated content but it's not for selection purposes but to inform the audience.
I think AI is good as a tool, but I don't want it to be the end result of everything. As it is, AI is inaccurate, and there is a lot of things needed to make it good. So in a way, I think a user needs to refine that AI content and fix it before it is good for people to use.
Ai is by far not perfect but it's getting better day by day. Nowadays I would say that ai can write better content than 95% of the population...
It is inevitable that AI will be used to create content on Hive. The question is not about whether it be created but about the quality of the content.
!ALIVE
!BBH
Interesting, thanks for sharing!
I'm a bit conflicted. I think AI will naturally be used in everything, but I also believe that human value should always be prioritized.
For Hive, I believe that AI can indeed help improve things, but not to generate all the content, so in this case human value is still extremely important.
I believe that if we use AI to leverage our creativity it's great. What I find not so great is when AI replaces our thinking and works autonomously without humans in the loop. Then we can't pretend that it's our content...
Some platforms are already change their algorithms to reduce slop ai content. AI is a tool, just like google, and could be used like that, but as humans tend to enjoy creative content, I think we just need to use it as a tool and not let it do everything.
It often reminds me of the people on hive who did 2 sentence posts and then copy pasted them into new ones. Low effort shouldn't be rewarded but I see people creating animation movies with ai, with a nice story and great animations. Even if AI does the heavy lifting, the creativity still comes from a human and I think we should be open also to reward such content.
It depends on the goal of each platform.
There's no stopping it tbh. We either adapt or die. 😱
Totally agree with you!
Writers can take help from the ai to correct or take suggestions.
Completeetly generated AI post is not good and should be not be encouraged.
Though,there are exceptions, like stats, charts, comments or snippets generated or consolidated used using AI tools.
!BBH
!ALIVE
!HBIT
imfarhad, you mined 0.9 🟧 HBIT and the user you replied to (liotes) received 0.1 HBIT on your behalf as a tip. You can receive 100% of the HBIT by replying to one of your own posts or comments. When you mine HBIT, you're also playing the Wusang: Isle of Blaq game. 🏴☠️ | tools | wallet | discord | community | daily <><
What's more, you found 1.0 ⚪ BLAQ pearl as a bonus treasure token!
Your random number was 0.15933296740227598, also viewable in the Discord server, #hbit-wusang-log channel. Check for bonus treasure tokens by entering your username at block explorer A, explorer B, or take a look at your wallet.
There is a treasure chest of bitcoin sats hidden in Wusang: Isle of Blaq. Happy treasure hunting! 😃 Read about Hivebits (HBIT) or read the story of Wusang: Isle of Blaq.
I think humans are becoming lazy and spoiled by AI. I am not against using AI as a tool to improve something that is being developed. Things made 100% by AI have no soul, and it is easy to see that, whether in text, images, or video.
It's by and large garbage/slop. Occasionally you'll get something decent, but it's so easy to make bulk amounts of mediocre crap, that I don't think encouraging it is a good idea.