RE: 🐝 Saturday Savers Week 47 β€” All Flags Still Green!

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Thankfully I don't come across that many people that do that.

Cool, it happens sometimes. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!BEER



0
0
0.000
63 comments
avatar

If you notice (at least) two people (on Hive) talking to each other with multiple replies per comment, then you can simply avoid looking at their conversations. πŸ§˜β€β™‚οΈ

The BEER token tipping command on my previous comment didn't work, even if it is the only bot command on that comment. 🀯 It looks like the BEER bot was drunk that time after all! πŸ˜†πŸ˜…

!PIZZA !HOPE !ALIVE !STRIDE

0
0
0.000
avatar

So should I have ignored this comment then?

See, I told you, it works sometimes, and not others, regardless of what other tip calls are used with it. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!PIZZA
!STRIDE

0
0
0.000
avatar

What I mean is (almost) every single comment from two people talking here on Hive gets two (or more) replies from the other. 🀯

Let's just think of the !BEER tipping token as the "drunk token" from now on. πŸΊπŸ˜†

0
0
0.000
avatar

That sounds like it would get confusing fast.

Works for me. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

Those (two or more) people might be well-prepared for such exponentially-growing conversations! 🀯

Here's a "drunk !BEER token" tipping attempt for you! πŸΊπŸ˜…

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hope so, and I'm glad that I won't be a part of it, unless of course the conversations are actually interesting, and even then I don't like multiple threads of conversation under the same post.

Fingers crossed! πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you are part of those conversations, then you could simply reply to one of the comments for every "layer" even if they talk using multiple replies per comment. πŸ€“

My BEER token tipping command on my previous comment worked twice, here and here. πŸ€” That's "drunk BEER tipping" !INDEED! πŸ»πŸ˜‚

0
0
0.000
avatar

I seriously have no interest in doing that.

Yep, it's a BEER roulette bot. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!INDEED

0
0
0.000
avatar

It was only if you (managed to) become part of such conversations though (whether you liked it or not). 🀯

It would be better if the !BEER token tipping bot always tipped one or more BEER, instead of zero or more. πŸ»πŸ˜…

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would generally avoid getting pulled into conversations like that.

Yep, true, or even that it just worked as it's supposed to work. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

But the problem is that you might eventually get pulled into such conversations, so let's !HOPE that you are ready when that happens !INDEED! πŸ˜†

Your BEER token tipping command there worked twice again! 😎 Perhaps the !WINEX token tipping bot can also become drunk from time to time (and probably already sometimes is, as it sometimes comments directly under the comment where it is called). πŸ˜†πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can't get pulled in if I don't respond!

Nifty, lucky you. I think lots of bots are wacky, especially lately. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

You can still get (suddenly) tagged there though (and directly asked to join in)! πŸ˜†

A Hive token tipping bot might get wacky like what happened to Crrdlx's HBIT bot (which technically is a token tipping bot too because it gives 0.1 HBIT to the author of the post or comment being replied to) before. πŸ˜…

0
0
0.000
avatar

Token tipping bot, like this: !hbit

0
0
0.000
avatar

crrdlx, you mined 0.9 🟧 HBIT and the user you replied to (savvyplayer) received 0.1 HBIT on your behalf as a tip. When you mine HBIT, you're also playing the Wusang: Isle of Blaq game. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ

Sorry, but you didn't find a bonus treasure token today. Try again tomorrow...they're out there! Your random number was 0.9805170939083945, also viewable in the Discord server, #hbit-wusang-log channel. | tools | wallet | discord | community | daily <><

Check for bonus treasure tokens by entering your username at a block explorer A, explorer B, or take a look at your wallet.
There is a treasure chest of bitcoin sats hidden in Wusang: Isle of Blaq. Happy treasure hunting! πŸ˜ƒ Read about Hivebits (HBIT) or read the story of Wusang: Isle of Blaq.
0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the 0.1 HBIT "token tip" !INDEED! πŸ€—

!WEIRD !PIZZA !HOPE

0
0
0.000
avatar

You know how many comments and replies disappear into the void. How would anyone know whether I even saw such a tag if I don't upvote or respond?

It keeps things interesting on the blockchain, as there's always some bot drama to keep us entertained. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!PIZZA
!STRIDE

0
0
0.000
avatar

They might continue tagging you occasionally (if they think that your mention notifications just get buried on your feed) until you finally reply (likely by asking them to refrain from tagging you)! πŸ€―πŸ˜†

That makes me think that there is no !FUN in a "perfect" bot. πŸ€–πŸ˜…

!PIZZA
!HOPE
!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thankfully that has not happened yet.

Nope, bots that work well are very boring, as there's no drama or variance in how they operate. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I wonder how we can say how well a bot works if it employs some sort of randomization (such as the HBIT token mining bot randomly giving BLAQ-based tokens). πŸ€”

The randomization itself may have problems too (such as the random number generator producing numbers that mostly "lean" to one side). πŸ€―πŸ€“

0
0
0.000
avatar

The first part of your sentence there is pretty convoluted and difficult to understand. Then it wouldn't be a true random-number generator if it skews to one side. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wasn't able to remove the word "if" between "say" and "how" on the first sentence of my previous comment. 🀯

I have read from (skilled) programmers online that there is no such thing as a "truly random" number generator (program) !INDEED. πŸ€“

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well that's odd.

I'd suggest checking out @thecrazygm's random dice roller that uses block data for randomization. His tests were quite interesting. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

I saw his website at https://thecrazygm.com/ and wanted to test it !INDEED, but it seems that there is not enough information there about the specifics of the randomization. πŸ€”πŸ€― We can register to his game on his website, though it requires Web2 information (username, password, and email address) upon registration, and Hive accounts aren't supported (at least directly). πŸ€―πŸ€“

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

Scan his posts, as he wrote two on exactly how he generates the randomness. His game website is now separate from the site for all his Hive tools, and on the gaming site, yes, he uses those methods of logging in. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!BBH
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Anyway, I almost avoided publishing my other reply to your comment there, because I saw the "Saturday Savers" phrase on the title of the original post, which thankfully is Bjorn's. πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!PIZZA
!LOLZ

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, Bjorn's posts are fine, only those published by the @eddie-earner account need to be avoided. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!LOLZ
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

The word "Saturday Savers" on the title of any original post will give me a "mini heart attack" after publishing or just before publishing a comment with any token tipping command. πŸ˜±πŸ˜†πŸ˜…

0
0
0.000
avatar

I imagine so for a tipper in a tipless land. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

That also includes any bot command, not just any Hive token tipping command !INDEED. πŸ€” The title having the word "Saturday" in it may already cause me to think twice about publishing a comment with a token tipping command, especially as I already accidentally tipped you under official #SaturdaySavers posts a few times. πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!WEIRD !HOPE !PIZZA !WINEX !ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Well, as long as you don't do any more digital archaeology, it shouldn't be a problem any longer, because the Saturday Savers Club came to an end after 5 years of operation. The Slothly Savers Club (I came up with 'Slothly', it was originally just 'Sloth'), a newly rebranded and relaunched iteration of the Saturday Savers Club that just began doesn't have any rules at all against tip usage. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

ALIVE
BBH
!HOPE
PIZZA
WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Do you mean that if I continue doing "digital archaeology", I might (accidentally) use token tipping commands under official #SaturdaySavers posts that might get noticed by someone else? 🀯

While it's known that you love coining terms, you also use already-existing but unusual words such as "Slothly". πŸ˜†

Your "quick typing fingers" (for which I would like to type "keyboard autocorrect" but you no longer want to put the "blame" on it most of the time) made you type all again tip! 🀣

!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

You can do your comment mining, but if you do, you need to be aware of which post the comment to which you're planning on replying is located.

No surprise then.

Cool, thanks. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!SLOTH

0
0
0.000
avatar

It looks like you coined the term "comment mining" as the process by which I discover your old comments by means of "digital archaeology", itself a term you apparently also mined !INDEED! πŸ˜†

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, pretty soon I'll have us speaking a whole new language! πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

The more you communicate with other "word coiners" (such as @borniet), the faster you coin more words! πŸ˜†

!WEIRD
!PIZZA
!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed, pretty soon you'll need a dictionary or translator to even understand us! πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!PIZZA
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

@borniet can (easily) create such dictionary and/or translator when he has free time! πŸ˜†

0
0
0.000
avatar

Time being the operative word there. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly!!! And things are NOT getting better at the moment ;-)
!HOPE
!PIZZA
!INDEED
!ALIVE
!BBH

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeedy, and lordy... πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!BBH
!PIZZA
!SLOTH

0
0
0.000
avatar

I just got reminded of @borniet's to-do list (or to-do lists of to-do lists or however it could "morph" into)! πŸ€―πŸ€―πŸ˜†

!WEIRD
!INDEED
!ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, and that's not even including all his day-to-day responsibilities in his life. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!INDEED
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, and Bjorn probably has separate to-do lists for that. πŸ€―πŸ€“

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

Likely so, and Hive is lower on the list. 😁 πŸ™ πŸ’š ✨ πŸ€™

!BEER

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, and other online tasks not related to work are likely even lower than Hive on that list. πŸ€―πŸ€“

!WEIRD
!LOLZ

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed, he hasn't popped up on Blurt or Qortal yet either, even though he has accounts on both. 😁 πŸ™ πŸ’š ✨ πŸ€™

!LOLZ
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Let's say that Bjorn already has "half the job done" by managing to create his own accounts for both platforms !INDEED, where "the other half of the job" is using those platforms (at least occasionally). 😎

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, that's true, and it would be great if it made even an occasional appearance. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think that we can only !HOPE that Bjorn currently has them on his (massive) to-do list, and he manages to finish more tasks on the list faster than new ones are added !INDEED. πŸ€―πŸ€—

!WEIRD !PIZZA !WINEX !ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, indeed, though it's not looking hopeful. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!MMB
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'd first need a dictionary to look up what the meaning of "time" is again ;-)
!HOPE
!PIZZA
!INDEED
!ALIVE
!BBH

0
0
0.000
avatar

That action of looking for the definition (or meaning) of the word "time" will !INDEED take time! πŸ€―πŸ€―πŸ€£πŸ˜‚ @tydynrain would surely agree! πŸ˜†πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000