โ† Back to the feed
โ—ˆ The Kingdom

RE: Always Hungry, Never Full

You're viewing a single comment's thread:

View full context ยท View direct parent

It's not my claim but the factual work of countless theologians who know the history of the bible and how it was compiled from disparate sources over the centuries.

Of course it is flawed as everything man made is flawed and faulty. The contradictory nature of the four gospels show us that alone

The current bible was put together in the 14th century. That's a long way from it's alleged origin and even further if you consider the epic of gilgamesh.

Sources were from oral stories as well as some early writings of the apostles. Most of the accounts of Jesus were transmitted orally and it was over a hundred years after his alleged existence that someone decided to write it down.

I've met many priests who privately don't believe a word of the bible but like the ideas contained within.

Remember the Muslims also claim that their holy book was dictated by God to Muhammad.

Coincidence? I think not.

Jesus Christ is a fascinating idea and it's a shame people don't follow the teachings that are ascribed to him whether or not he existed. There are good lessons to be learned.

I wonder what he would make of the current brands of so called Christianity.

They would be unrecognisable to any early Christian.

It was an interesting topic for what it's worth. ๐Ÿ‘

0
0
๐Ÿ’ฌ 1

Add a comment

1 comments

avatar

The current bible was put together in the 14th century. That's a long way from it's alleged origin and even further if you consider the epic of gilgamesh.

The Septuagint and Hebrew bible would beg to differ.

Sources were from oral stories as well as some early writings of the apostles. Most of the accounts of Jesus were transmitted orally and it was over a hundred years after his alleged existence that someone decided to write it down.

Absolutely! Thank God there were witnesses. And the fact that the 'contradictions' of the gospels is there, actually proves the validity of Scripture. Even the contradictions aren't because of the bible, but because of man's translations and understandings.

I've met many priests who privately don't believe a word of the bible but like the ideas contained within.

Yeah Roman Catholicism isn't the greatest example of truth filled faith.

Remember the Muslims also claim that their holy book was dictated by God to Muhammad.

And yet, the Qu'ran says the Hebrew bible is doctrine and that the injeel is legit. So even their holy text confirms scripture. :)

Jesus Christ is a fascinating idea and it's a shame people don't follow the teachings that are ascribed to him whether or not he existed. There are good lessons to be learned.

I wonder what he would make of the current brands of so called Christianity.

They would be unrecognisable to any early Christian.

Completely agree with these statements because you are right...Christianity as a whole is misrepresented by...Fallen human beings. Which shows us the need for a Savior because we are all sinners.

This is a fascinating discussion, and I really do appreciate the dialogue.

0
0
0.000