AI as a learning tool versus a replacement for learning

I've been thinking a lot about AI and human intelligence lately, especially from my developer viewpoint. It's something I go back and forth on pretty much daily. Like yesterday I was reviewing some code where we integrated an AI component for data processing, and I caught myself wondering how much of the logic I was actually engaging with versus just implementing what was suggested. That made me wonder - are we changing how deeply we think about problems?

Working with code every day, I notice this tension. These AI tools are fantastic for debugging or suggesting optimizations I might miss. They can handle the repetitive parts of coding that used to eat up hours. But sometimes I worry about what happens to our problem-solving muscles when we rely on AI-generated solutions too heavily.

Remember when we used to have to trace through complex algorithms by hand? Now I can just paste problematic code into an AI and get a reasonable explanation of what's happening. It's incredibly useful, but I'm not sure I'm developing the same depth of understanding that comes from wrestling with a problem manually.

I noticed this with a junior dev on my team too. They were building a feature and got stuck on an issue. Instead of diving into documentation or thinking through the problem architecture, they immediately asked an AI for a solution. The code worked, but when I asked them to explain why they chose that particular approach, they struggled. That gave me pause.

But then again, maybe these tools are just freeing us up to think at higher levels of abstraction? Like, I don't need to reinvent basic CRUD operations or spend hours on boilerplate code anymore, so maybe I can focus more on system design and user experience? That's what I tell myself on optimistic days.

I guess what I'm really thinking about is skill development. Our abilities as developers come from facing and overcoming challenges. If AI smooths out too many of those bumps, do we still develop the same problem-solving instincts? Like, why struggle through implementing a complex algorithm when an AI can generate a working version in seconds?

The creative side of development concerns me too. There's something about the process of designing an elegant solution that feels important. When AI handles more of that, I definitely ship faster, but I sometimes miss that eureka moment when you finally crack a difficult problem after multiple approaches.

I'm not anti-AI tools at all - they're part of my daily workflow now. But I'm trying to be more intentional about when and how I use them. Maybe use AI for initial scaffolding or to get past blockers, but make sure I'm really understanding what's happening under the hood, questioning the approaches, and adding my own expertise.

What I don't want is to wake up in five years and realize my debugging skills or my ability to architect complex systems has weakened because I've been letting algorithms do too much heavy lifting. It's like how we had to start going to the gym once our jobs stopped involving physical labor - maybe we'll need to intentionally exercise our coding brains too.

But maybe I'm overthinking it? People probably had similar concerns when IDEs started offering autocomplete and refactoring tools. I wonder if this is just the next evolution in developer tools, or if there's something fundamentally different about offloading actual problem-solving to AI.

Anyway, I'm still figuring out where I stand with all this. For now, I'm just trying to use these tools mindfully, being aware of when I might be taking shortcuts that could impact my growth as a developer in the long run.

Posted Using INLEO