Did the USA just make algorithmic stable coins illegal?

Introduction: Did the Genius Act make HBD Illegal in the USA?

  • The USA just passed different versions of the so called GENIUS ACT to regulate stablecoins.
  • Many people on X and YouTube are saying that this act makesalgorithmic stablecoins illegal.
  • This category algorithmic stablecoins refers to stable coins not backed by Traditional Assets, defined as dollars or short term treasury bonds.

Answer

  • Based on tmy reading of thae actual law, not comments on X, the GENIUS Act, as passed by the US Senate, does not explicitly make all algorithmic stablecoins illegal. But don't take my word for it. Lets look at what the law actually says and draw your own conclusions.

Here's a breakdown of how the GENIUS Act addresses algorithmic stablecoins:

  1. Does not prohibit them outright: The Act does not contain an explicit ban on algorithmic stablecoins.

  2. Mandates a Treasury study: Instead of prohibiting them, the GENIUS Act mandates a comprehensive study by the Treasury Department on "endogenously collateralized stablecoins," which are a type of algorithmic stablecoin.

  3. Imposes strict reserve requirements: The Act imposes stringent reserve requirements for stablecoins used for payment, requiring a 1:1 backing with traditional assets. This means any stablecoin backed primarily by crypto assets, algorithmic mechanisms, or fractional reserves would be considered non-compliant with these requirements.

It is important to note:

  • The GENIUS Act effectively bans algorithmic stablecoins from being payment stablecoins, by requiring payment stablecoins to be backed 1:1 by traditional assets.
  • So...While not an explicit ban, the 1:1 backing requirement essentially makes algorithmic stablecoins, which rely on algorithms or other crypto assets for stability, non-compliant with the Act's framework for Payment Stablecoins.

Payment Stablecoins

  • The Act focuses on payment-focused stablecoins: The regulatory framework of the GENIUS Act generally applies to stablecoins used for payment purposes.

Last words...

  • In summary, while the GENIUS Act doesn't make all algorithmic stablecoins illegal, its stringent requirements, particularly the 1:1 backing with traditional assets, effectively prevent their use within the defined regulatory framework for payment stablecoins.
  • This may have a significant impact on the future of algorithmic stablecoins in the US, potentially limiting their viability for payment purposes.

Posted Using INLEO



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

This is a very informative breakdown! The GENIUS Act seems to take a cautious approach rather than a direct ban. While it's not an outright prohibition, the 1:1 traditional asset requirement certainly makes it nearly impossible for algorithmic stablecoins like HBD to qualify as payment stablecoins under this law. I wonder how decentralized communities and projects will adapt to these evolving regulations. Thanks for sharing this valuable insight!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree with you.
I was very pleased at the cautious and wise approach the GENIUS act takes towards stablecoins. It shows an attitudinal change towards fairness and promotion of innovation which is new and refreshing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Absolutely! It’s encouraging to see a regulatory framework that balances caution with openness to innovation. Let’s hope this sets a precedent for more fair and forward-thinking policies in the crypto space. Thanks again for the discussion!

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I was just asking about HBD's legal status (for other reason), and how it effects Hive regarding multi-wallets, exchanges listings, how big threat they see in HBD.

Blocktrades answered, there is no legal issue with HBD. Looks like, it's not just me, who think potential third parties see risk in Hive because of HBD.

His explanation, that it doesn't fall in the LUNA stablecoin category is pretty simple. :) HBD was here before.... :)

11.jpg

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for the information.

@blocktrades is a very knowledgable developer on Hive now and previously on Steem. He also runs a witness.

I appreciate any information he has to share, and I believe it is 100% correct.

HBD is thinly traded and because it is, he is absolutely correct it doesn't fulfill the same role as USDT, mainly a place to park your profits from speculation on altcoins or bitcoin.

HBD has an important role here on Hive and a profitable one.

I agree with what he says about the Bots. Did he offer any information about where those bits originate, and does he participate?

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, he didnt.

I never looked into stablecoins, although, i have some staked, so just try to find out generally the risks about the crypto backed, algorithmic ones, and how these can effect negatively the chain where they are. HBD-Hive, too.

Now this law thing is another interesting topic, maybe not right now, but definetly within 1-2 years.

When the 'news' sites write, it is banned, probably doesnt mean they are really banned.

I can't find any info about what applies for businesses and private individuals in case they still want to use it, so I just suppose, it won't really applies for them.

Probably shouldnt even start, because I am just more confused than i was before.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My dear is hope this will not later backfire

0
0
0.000