RE: Three Legacy: How To Play

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Yes, but some people would prefer that such "cans of worms" be opened by someone else !INSTEAD of themselves !INDEED. πŸ€”πŸ₯«πŸ›πŸ€―πŸ˜†

!WEIRD
!HOPE



0
0
0.000
22 comments
avatar

I think that most people would far prefer that. I know that I do. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Maybe they should prefer to open "good versions" of "cans of worms", or at least the "non-harmful ones" !INDEED! πŸ€”πŸ₯«πŸͺ±πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm certainly open to an explosion of good things at once. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

Some worms πŸ› are good for the soil (such as earthworms) and cause no harm to plants or animals, so there are "good worms" !INDEED! πŸ€”πŸ§˜β€β™‚οΈπŸ€―πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm sure parasitic worms consider themselves good worms too. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Someone considering themselves "good" does not necessarily make them actually good. πŸ€”πŸ€―

Maybe a relevant question for that is "good for who or what". πŸ§˜β€β™‚οΈπŸ€―πŸ˜…

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is another one of those comments to which I already replied, but it apparently disappeared into the Ecency Void. Indeed, I've certainly noticed that.

Another useful question to ask is who gets to decide what is good for whom or what. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

0
0
0.000
avatar

I just keep the page where I just published a comment using #Ecency open until #PeakD or another Hive frontend shows that such comment has already been published, which takes more or less 10 seconds every single time after I click/press the "Reply" button on Ecency. πŸ€”πŸ€―πŸ€“

We might open a "(good) can of worms πŸ›" there! πŸ€―πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!LOLZ

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's a useful workaround. It's not that important to me, so I don't worry about it much at all. It's just annoying when one disappears.

No doubt, cans of worms multiply faster than rabbits. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!LOLZ
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can imagine that @savvyplayer who publishes more or less 25 comments per day (which can be determined on the #Ecency Weekly Leaderboard) needs an extra of roughly 4 minutes per day just to ensure that a given comment published on Ecency has actually already been published before moving on to the next comment to reply to !INDEED. πŸ€”πŸ€―

Given that worms obviously can multiply, I wonder how cans themselves (containing worms) can multiply too. πŸ›πŸ₯«πŸ€―πŸ€―πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

I've been doing that more myself, though it doesn't take me that long for each one.

That's the magic of cans of worms. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!BBH
!PIXY
!UNICOIN
!WINE

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

@savvyplayer is considering the "strategy" of moving to the next comment to reply to while the #Ecency backend is still trying to publish a given comment on the Hive blockchain, then come back to the previous comment replied at to see if its reply already got published, though it sometimes causes confusion as to which comments from other people on Hive already got replies. πŸ€”πŸ€―πŸ˜…

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's how I do asset pool management now, especially without BeeSwap, I open multiple tabs, one for each pool, begin the transaction to add liquidity, then I move on to the next, returning shortly afterward to see if it succeeded or not. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Do you mean that the #BeeSwap alternative by CryptoDreamr is having problems publishing #HiveEngine token transactions (adding liquidity to pools in your case)? πŸ€”πŸ€―πŸ€“

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, that's not what I mean at all. CrytoDreamr works fine, but it doesn't, and has never done, concurrent transactions, so to make it do so I need to open multiple tabs simultaneously. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar

@savvyplayer told me before that whenever they managed their #HiveEngine token liquidity on #BeeSwap while that platform was still working, they didn't work on multiple liquidity pools at the same time, so they weren't aware of that BeeSwap feature before !INDEED. πŸ€”πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!LOLZ

0
0
0.000
avatar

I see. Well, since I have a lot of pools to manage across multiple accounts, BeeSwap's concurrent transactions sped up the process immensely. I could add liquidity to one, then move on to others down the line in quick succession, and each transaction would pop up with a small progress bar on the right side of the screen, sometimes 5-10 at a time. Without that, managing pools is just so much slower, even now. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!INDEED
!LOLZ

0
0
0.000
avatar

We could !HOPE for a #HiveEngine dapp which fetches a Hive Engine wallet's available tokens, recommends the best liquidity pools for such tokens (and takes into account the owner's favorite pools), then recommends putting liquidity to token pairs. πŸ€”πŸ€“ Since private active key is required, it will ask for multiple signs though using #HiveKeychain !INDEED. πŸ€―πŸ˜…

!WEIRD
!WINEX

0
0
0.000
avatar

While that sounds pretty cool, it also sounds quite complex to actually implement. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Because of the fact that some #HiveEngine tokens (even popular ones) have a large relative difference between their respective lowest sell offers and highest buy offers, even a simple app which will just list down tokens with low sell offers and high buy offers would be a challenge. πŸ€”πŸ’ΈπŸ€―πŸ€“

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's where liquidity pools come in handy, because they even out the prices a fair bit. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!LOLZ
!WEIRD

0
0
0.000