RE: Hive Ecosystem | Data on Curation Groups & KE Ratios!
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Good curation criteria should be comprehensive -> and not formal, not mechanical but manual. For me personally, KE / person's HP strength / amount of efforts invested in a post / user engagement, activity -> all these aspects are important.
Example (negative).
Look at 10 posts in a row from a common 'successful' Hive blogger, and you may see each post got solid support, while having 0 comments; or just 5-10 formal comments from bots; but did not attracted a single Hive user, all skipped it (even if they gave their votes for this content) - I see it as an internal vice.... and to me such rewarding is questionable. (And, yes, I understand very well when we add such a formal criterion for curators - it will not lead to anything good, except for hundreds of comments a la 'Brilliant click / Successful post / Have a nice day', etc). heh.
Or, you see an interesting topic - and see comments, and the comments are a combination of
"THIS POST HAS BEEN CURATED BY X"
"THANK YOU FOR HODL HIVE ENGINE TOKEN Y"
"Nice post Deer"
"Hmm, interesting"
And ... you get disappointed that there's no genuine engagement or discussion behind a potentially interesting post that you decided to read.