¡A battle already lost beforehand! ...it's my MeMe #107

avatar

Have you ever wondered...

1.- ¿Who today might be interested in the content generated and produced on Hive?
2.- To who do you think it has been written/created for and with what intentions?
3.- Especially when 90% of it starts with phrases like: ¡Hey guys, my beautiful people! ¡I hope everyone is well and have had a wonderful day! I am fine and I...

JUNK

Posts with rewards set to burn still pay curators.

Only author rewards are burned.

If you think this type of content should be eligible for author rewards, then «click» here.

Thanks for your support.

As for the first question, maybe a possible answer could be this below:

«Smart Audience»

Desolation

As for the second dual question, the answers could very well be these:

«Hive Content Creators»

«Hive Content Curators»

Holy cow, folks! Do you really think the content you're currently creating and generating on Hive will attract the attention of moderately intelligent people outside the platform as to lose their time consuming it and that it may motivate them to come back for more or even share it with everyone they know so they want register and join Hive as well?

Eerm... I don't know. Perhaps some like: True investors, business people, social influencers, dApp developers, serious content creators, smart consumers, demanding audiences, etc?

Sheez kids! more creativity folks. More creativity, value and originality please!

«'Abstract Aural Bit'»



««If you appreciate what I've said, don't upvote me, be smarter!»»

Leave a comment. Share your experiences and feedback. ¡Be part of the conversation!

«««-$-»»»

"Follows, Comments, Rehives & Upvotes will be highly appreciated"

Cranky Gandalf

Cheers!



0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

Jaja, ¡MeMe #107 nailed it! 🤣 Esas introducciones son épicas. 😉

0
0
0.000
avatar

Esas introducciones son épicas. 😉

LoL, tan épicas como sea necesario para que el mensaje penetre hondo como clavo caliente en sus cerebros y pueda crear consciencia. };)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Fairly sure no one is interested in the content on facebook, reddit, youtube, or other platforms in twenty minutes, or twenty days after it is posted.

The internet is now a timeline, not an archive. If it isn't new, it isn't valued.

Fast fashion, for content.

I miss the old Internet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Fairly sure no one is interested in the content on facebook, reddit, youtube, or other platforms in twenty minutes, or twenty days after it is posted.

Yep, that's true. But you also won't see many people in/from Facebook, Reddit, YouTube, or other platforms shilling their own "content creation" platform everywhere in a so insistent and savage way.

The internet is now a timeline, not an archive. If it isn't new, it isn't valued.

I have the hunch that if the content people publish on the Internet were truly original, interesting, unique and valuable, then I have no doubt that it actually would be unforgettable, immutable and evergreen.

Fast fashion, for content.

Goddamn TikTokers with ADHD. ;o)

I miss the old Internet.

Yeah, join the party!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Books are frozen in time. They're printed, put on shelves, and don't change (except for textbooks that get their revised editions every few years as the peer reviewed research changes)

But pages on the Internet are ever changing and fluid, and in the case of stuff that doesn't have a /diff command, so you can see the difference between old and new, it could be seen as the Internet being perpetually under construction.

I wish there was more timeless content on the Internet. I keep going back to the same books, and each time, I understand them more deeply, or find new insights.

I revisit my own writing often, perhaps its narcissistic, perhaps it helps me remember, but I am delusional enough to know that I have to keep looking at it myself, because no one else will, and content only dies when people aren't looking at it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Books are frozen in time. They're printed, put on shelves, and don't change (except for textbooks that get their revised editions every few years as the peer reviewed research changes)

Yeah, that's usually the trend. Especially with the "conventional" stuff.

But pages on the Internet are ever changing and fluid, and in the case of stuff that doesn't have a /diff command, so you can see the difference between old and new, it could be seen as the Internet being perpetually under construction.

Of course. On the Internet, everything is constantly changing, evolving and you have to adapt to that in a permanent way. Nonetheless, there are some of us with enough age and unique work habits/ethics/knowledge/experience which under our early rebellious philosophies plus a great eidetic memory in very good shape, we are still capable to clearly remember the differences between the old and the new on the Internet without any need of consultation of what might be still under construction.

I wish there was more timeless content on the Internet. I keep going back to the same books, and each time, I understand them more deeply, or find new insights.

Yeah, I get you. Certainly you will always find new insights as long you consult, revisit or interact with the appropriate sources.

By the way, did you know or have heard before about Ishkur's Guide?
This is a legendary website still online since 1999, you know? And although it's only been 26 years since its creation, there are still many people who don't know anything about it. Same as textfiles milk.com or youngmonkey from 1994.

I revisit my own writing often, perhaps its narcissistic, perhaps it helps me remember, but I am delusional enough to know that I have to keep looking at it myself, because no one else will, and content only dies when people aren't looking at it.

Nah! As I told you before, if the content is really unique, good, interesting, valuable and original... it will never die. You just have to ask to Bootleg if you don't believe me. };)

And thank you so much for your tip. I'm so glad you're one of the smart ones.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Im too young to remember BBS, this is a bit more period accurate for me:

0
0
0.000