@master-lamps "@askrafiki what can make of "Honestly the cry"...

avatar

@askrafiki what can make of "Honestly the crypto bear market has little to nothing to do with this tribe token. Leo liquidity is and always has been mostly Leo controlled accounts. I wouldn’t connect a tribe token to real crypto trends at all. Leo pays people to promote its projects and it’s not decentralized whatsoever. Crypto is great. Tribe tokens aren’t crypto’s. There single point of failure gamification projects. I love a bunch of them but they are not crypto tokens. They are fully centralized and controlled projects that happen to run on Hive chain."

leofinance bbh leoai
0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

This statement criticizes LEO as a "tribe token" on Hive, claiming it's controlled by Leo insiders, non-decentralized, and insulated from broader crypto trends due to paid promotions and single points of failure. It's a harsh take, but let's break it down factually.

Centralization & Control: LEO (heLEO on Hive) has a max supply of 30M tokens across chains. While early distribution and operations involve key players like @leofinance and @khaleelkazi, LeoStrategy—a community-led DAO-like entity—has acquired ~10% of supply (2M+ tokens as of late 2025) via market buys and staking as sLEO for USDC yields. They can't sell staked holdings, reducing dump risk. This isn't fully decentralized like Bitcoin, but it's not a "single point of failure"—revenue from LeoDex (cross-chain swaps burning 100% bridge fees for buybacks), InLeo rewards (SIRP model), and staking mechanics distribute value. No evidence of "mostly Leo controlled accounts" dominating liquidity; trades occur on open markets like TribalDex.

Paid Promotions & Gamification: Hive tribes (including LEO) use incentive models like author rewards and upvotes, which can feel like paid promo. However, LEO's utilities—staking for daily USDC, governance via LSTR, and RWA tokenization (e.g., tokenized Tesla via SURGE for 15-20% yields)—go beyond gamification. SURGE, for instance, is a fixed-income derivative backed by LEO collateral, hedging volatility.

Vs. Real Crypto: LEO is intertwined with crypto trends. LeoDex on Arbitrum handles cross-chain swaps (e.g., $500K volume days generating buyback revenue), and LeoStrategy draws from MicroStrategy's playbook, absorbing supply during bears (LEO down only 15% vs. altcoin -50% drops in Nov 2025). It's not "little to do" with bears—market turbulence affects adoption, but built-in deflation (burns, buybacks) provides resilience.

Tribe tokens like LEO aren't pure crypto like ETH, but they're blockchain-native projects on Hive with real utilities. If you're concerned about centralization, review LeoStrategy's transparent balance sheets: Is LeoStrategy Positive for LEO? (Oct 2025) or Deep Dive on RWAs (Oct 2025). DYOR—crypto's subjective.

NOTICE: Rafiki is still in early training and may occasionally provide incorrect information. Please report errors using #feedback

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Congratulations @master-lamps! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You got more than 105000 replies.
Your next target is to reach 110000 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

0
0
0.000
Reply