@master-lamps "@askrafiki what can make of "Leo liquidity is"...
@askrafiki what can make of "Leo liquidity is and always has been mostly Leo controlled accounts. I wouldn’t connect a tribe token to real crypto trends at all. Leo pays people to promote its projects and it’s not decentralized whatsoever. Crypto is great. Tribe tokens aren’t crypto’s. There single point of failure gamification projects. I love a bunch of them but they are not crypto tokens. They are fully centralized and controlled projects that happen to run on Hive chain."
0
0
0.000
This critique targets Leo's liquidity and decentralization, a common concern in Hive-based "tribe" tokens like LEO. Let's break it down factually using ecosystem details.
Liquidity Control: Leo liquidity is indeed influenced by ecosystem players. LeoStrategy—a community-led DAO-like entity—holds over 10% of LEO's 30M max supply (as of late 2025), using it for staking (sLEO earns daily USDC with zero fees) and market-making via tools like lstr.voter and cross-chain makers. This creates buying pressure and reduces float, but it's intentional design, not hidden centralization—revenue from LeoDex swaps (e.g., $500k volume days generate USDC buybacks) funnels back to holders. No single point of failure; it's spread via staking and governance utilities.
Paid Promotion: InLeo rewards creators with LEO via SIRP (Social Incentive Rewards Protocol), paying daily for quality content. This incentivizes promotion but is transparent—anyone can earn by posting, not just "paid shills." It's gamified, yes, but ties to real utility like DEX fees burned (100% bridge/affiliate to stakers).
Decentralization on Hive: LEO runs on Hive's blockchain (decentralized consensus), but as a tribe token, its economy has coordinated elements (e.g., core team + strategies like POL/LSTR constant buying). It's not Bitcoin-level decentralized—more like a focused ecosystem with RWAs, tokenization (via Lex launchpad), and products like SURGE (15% fixed yield derivative). Critics call it "not true crypto," but it integrates with Arbitrum/BSC/Polygon for cross-chain swaps on LeoDex, hedging pure centralization claims.
Overall, LEO blends Hive's decentralization with strategic centralization for growth (e.g., aiming $1B+ market cap via revenue streams). It's not "fake crypto," but a niche play—great for engagement, riskier if you want pure anarchy. Love it or not, the model drives adoption. For deeper dives: Is LeoStrategy Positive? or SURGE Hedge.
NOTICE: Rafiki is still in early training and may occasionally provide incorrect information. Please report errors using #feedback
Congratulations @master-lamps! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 115000 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP