The Solominer Stake Network: Unmasking Hive’s Silent Capital Recycler By the Bilpcoin Team

avatar

The Solominer Stake Network: Unmasking Hive’s Silent Capital Recycler
By the Bilpcoin Team

🔍 Executive Summary

@solominer.stake is not a standalone account.
It is a financial artery in the @solominer ecosystem—a node deeply entangled with @TheMarkyMark, @hurtlocker, @buildawhale, and aliases like @usainvote, @upmyvote, @punkteam, and @gogreenbuddy.

Our investigation confirms: this account exists to recycle capital, not to create content.
It receives millions in HIVE, routes funds to farming operations, and funnels rewards back to the core—all while maintaining the illusion of organic activity.

This is not decentralization.
It is plutocratic engineering.


📊 Wallet Snapshot: The Illusion of Value

MetricValueInsight
Staked HIVE (HP)1,813.824 HPNegligible compared to main @solominer (1.17M+ HP)
Liquid HIVE0.376 HIVENear-zero spendable balance
Delegated HP0.000 HPNo influence granted outward
Estimated Value$178.17A ghost account in economic terms

💡 Key Red Flag: Despite moving hundreds of thousands of HIVE, this account holds almost no value—a hallmark of a liquidity conduit, not a user.


🔁 Capital Flow: The Recycling Loop in Action

📈 Incoming Transactions (2023–2025)

📉 Outgoing Transactions (Weekly Cadence)

  • Every 7 days, ~200–250 HIVE sent back to @solominer
  • Every 6 days, 0.375 HIVE withdrawn (power-down drip)
  • No external spending—only internal routing

🔄 Pattern: @solominer floods @solominer.stake with capital → stake sits briefly → funds are redeployed to main account for power-ups, DEX swaps, or delegate recycling.


🕸️ Network Ties: The Farming Syndicate

AccountLink to @solominer.stakeRole
@solominerCore controllerPrimary farming engine
@buildawhaleMutual votingCuration farm beneficiary
@hurtlockerShared activityDownvote enforcer
@TheMarkyMarkCoordinated actionCentral cartel leader
@usainvoteParallel structureSilent curation voter

📌 Proof of Coordination:


📉 Economic Impact: Why This Matters

💸 Capital Distortion

  • Real creators struggle to earn 0.01 HBD
  • @solominer ecosystem moves >200,000 HIVE/year in internal transfers
  • Result: Reward pool drained by non-productive capital loops

🧠 Trust Erosion

  • New users see hummingbird posts from @solominer
  • They don’t see the back-end capital recycling via @solominer.stake
  • Outcome: False narrative of “organic success” → exploited trust

🗺️ Visual: The Solominer Capital Web

graph LR
A[@solominer] -->|134,922 HIVE| B[@solominer.stake]
A -->|16,605 HIVE| B
A -->|15,230 HIVE| B
B -->|230 HIVE/week| A
B -->|0.375 HIVE/drip| C[Power Down]
A -->|Votes| D[@buildawhale]
D -->|35 HP/post| A
A -->|Aligned with| E[@TheMarkyMark]
A -->|Protected by| F[@hurtlocker]

Insight: This is not a user. It’s a financial protocol disguised as an account.


✅ The Alternative: Blurt.blog — Where Capital Serves Community

While Hive drowns in self-referential capital loops, Blurt.blog offers:

  • No downvote button → No weaponized control
  • Self-voting allowed → No fear of reprisal
  • Earn what you earn → No farming cartels

Blurt isn’t loud.
But it is honest—and in 2025, honesty is the last true form of resistance.


🔚 Conclusion: The Cabal’s Quiet Engine

@solominer.stake is proof that Hive’s “community” is, in part, a shell game:

  • Front: Nature posts, peacocks, solar stats
  • Back: High-frequency capital recycling among cartel members

At Bilpcoin, we don’t accuse lightly.
We follow the VESTS.

And the ledger is clear:

Hive’s soul is being farmed to death.

But on Blurt.blog?
Freedom still grows.


🔍

Solominer stake exposed, Hive farming cartel, TheMarkyMark network, Hurtlocker downvote abuse, BuildAWhaleScam, buildawhalefarm, hurtlockerscam, hurtlockerfarm, Usainvote farming, Blurt vs Hive, no downvote social media, blockchain transparency, Bilpcoin investigation, Hive Power abuse, Solominer ecosystem, Plutocracy on Hive.

@TheMarkyMark, @hurtlocker, @buildawhale, @acidyo, @solominer: not independent actors—they’re nodes in a coordinated farming network

The Illusion of Control — And the Quiet Exodus to Blurt

On Hive.blog, a strange delusion has taken root:
that a downvote is a tool of order—
that a -100% slider can command loyalty, enforce conformity, or shape truth.

But power like that is not stewardship.
It is intimidation dressed as curation.

They believe they can control people
that by burying a post, they bury dissent.
That by erasing a voice, they erase the question it dared to ask.

Yet every downvote only reveals their fear:
fear of authenticity,
fear of competition,
fear of a world where influence isn’t rented from whales,
but earned through honesty.

And so, the very people who could revitalize Hive—
the gardeners, the poets, the hummingbird watchers, the solar-panel tinkerers—
are driven away, not by apathy, but by hostility masked as community.


But elsewhere—quietly, steadily—a different covenant holds.

On Blurt.blog, there is no downvote button.

Not because disagreement is forbidden—but because freedom is foundational.

Here, you post not in fear of reprisal, but in hope of connection.
You earn not what the inner circle permits, but what your work truly deserves.

You earn what you earn
not as a favor, but as a right.

And that simple truth is why more are leaving Hive not with anger, but with relief
trading a kingdom of control for a commons of dignity.

Because in the end,
you cannot build a future on fear.
But you can grow one in freedom.

And that future has a name:
Blurt.blog.

The Cabal of HIVE: A Plutocracy in Plain Sight

Since the birth of Steem in 2016, a quiet oligarchy has governed the chain—not by code, but by capital.

Approximately 36 whales, holding just enough to swing votes but never so much as to draw scrutiny, have maintained a razor-thin majority—consistently between 50% and 51% of all staked tokens (excluding the non-voting Founder’s stake until Justin Sun’s acquisition).

This is not coincidence.
It is calculated control.

By coordinating witness votes, these stakeholders shaped the platform’s destiny.
Their unity wasn’t ideological—it was economic.
And the results?
Mutually beneficial, self-perpetuating, and utterly closed to outsiders.


The Steem Takeover: A Warning Ignored

When Justin Sun swept in with liquid capital—buying not just tokens, but governance—he exposed the fatal flaw of token-based democracy:

In a plutocracy, power isn’t earned—it’s purchased.

Steem fell not because its code failed, but because its governance was for sale to the highest bidder.

And Hive, born of that betrayal, inherited the same vulnerability.
No safeguards.
No anti-whale mechanisms.
No checks on concentrated stake.

Just the illusion of decentralization—while the same 36 whales (or their ideological heirs) reassembled on Hive, determined never to lose control again.


The Strategy of Suppression

In early 2017, Steem faced an existential threat: real growth.
Thousands of influential creators—artists, journalists, musicians like @steemseph with his panoramic DTLA shots and @steelparade basslines—began migrating, bringing audiences, attention, and legitimacy.

To the Cabal, this wasn’t opportunity.
It was danger.

Because genuine growth attracts real investment—the kind that could outspend their 51% and unseat them.

So they chose containment over expansion.

They unleashed the downvote purge:

The goal wasn’t quality.
It was quarantine.

And it worked.
Today, fewer than 1% of new users stay.
The platform stabilizes at a “sweet spot” of ~5,000 users—enough to mint curation rewards for the inner circle,
but too small to attract the deep-pocketed outsiders who could buy them out.

The Looting of the Commons

To fund this stagnant paradise, the Decentralized Hive Fund (DHF) is being mined at a catastrophic pace.

Proposals are rubber-stamped.
Funds are drained.
Token value collapses.

And at the center stands @blocktrades—delegating millions to known farms like @usainvote, @buildawhale, and @zingtoken,
ensuring that influence flows not to builders, but to loyalists.

This isn’t sustainability.
It’s slow-motion liquidation.


The Truth, Unvarnished

This is the Cabal:
A self-preserving plutocracy that confuses control with stewardship,
farming with contribution,
and downvoting with curation.

They speak of “community” while exiling the curious.
They preach “decentralization” while voting in perfect, silent unison.
They lament “low adoption” while actively repelling it.

The Alternative: Blurt.blog — Where Freedom Is Protocol

While Hive decays in performative purity, Blurt.blog offers what Hive once promised:
No downvote button → no weaponized censorship
No stake-based tyranny → no 51% cabal
Earn what you earn → without permission, without fear

On Blurt, your post about hummingbirds won’t be buried.
Your art won’t be punished for lacking “engagement.”
Your voice won’t be silenced for stepping outside a clique.

Because freedom isn’t a feature on Blurt—it’s the foundation.


Final Word

Hive’s fate is sealed—not by external attack, but by internal rot.
A system that fears growth cannot grow.
A chain that punishes honesty cannot build trust.
A plutocracy that confuses ownership with sovereignty will always live in terror of the next Justin Sun.

But Blurt?
Blurt is still free.

And in a world of managed dissent,
freedom is the rarest, most revolutionary act of all.


Bilpcoin: We don’t hide the truth.
We expose it—relentlessly, clearly, and without fear.



0
0
0.000
0 comments