Leo Ecosystem Analysis - LeoDex, LeoStrategy (SURGE, LSTR), INLEO

avatar

The Leo ecosystem has undergone some substantial transformation in the past several months.

  • $LEO is no longer a Hive native, Layer Two token, but rather an "Arbitrum Native" token with wrapped versions available on BNB, Polygon, and Hive.

  • Total LEO supply is capped at 30,000,000 and no additional LEO will be generated under the existing contracts.

  • A LSTR token was created by @leostrategy with the express purchase of using revenues from the sale of LSTR to purchase LEO.

  • 100,000 LSTR tokens were minted for the presale on Hive Engine out of a possible 1,000,000.

  • A SURGE token was created by @leostrategy with a fixed yield based on a value of $1.00 per token, a portion of the revenues from the sale of surge were reported to be set aside the first six (6) months of yield payments.

  • Liquidity Pools will reportedly be established for both SURGE, and LSTR on BASE within a matter of days.

  • SURGE tokens held on Hive receive yield in HBD or LSTR, SURGE holders on BASE will be paid yield in a US dollar denominated stable coin.

  • LEO can be staked on the LeoDex platform for a a proportionate share or swap fee revenue.

  • LeoDex primarily appears to be operated in the Thorchain/Maya ecosystem, Maya is a fork of Thorchain with a similar token schema.


According to X Scanner which tracks exchanges and swap interfaces in the Thorchain/Maya ecosystem, LeoDex was ranked 13th for Earnings, generating approximately $3,050 in revenue from swaps. LeoDex's dashboard indicates that approximately 2,035,500 LEO have been staked on the site current valued at ~$262,580. Without compounding if LEO maintains it's price and LeoDEX maintains its revenue that is approximately 14% APY. Presumably some transaction fee is charged to collect the site revenue distributions, though it may be a negligible fee for larger positions.

Khal from InLeo has stated he believe he can grow the volume and presumably fees generated by LeoDex, which would correspondingly raise the APY for staked LEO. Unless the token is forked or site mechanisms are changed the revenue can has dilution limit, given that ~7% of existing LEO is already staked at LeoDex. The bridge established between Hive Leo and Arbitrum Leo burns 10% of the transferred LEO further reducing supply, but also negates a portion of a potential stakers effective yield if they choose to use the bridge mechanism.


The term "flywheel" is used to describe the price growth in the LEO token by Leostrategy. Bootstrapping may be more appropriate as most of the largest holders of SURGE and LSTR also are substantial holders of LEO on Hive. The vast majority of circulating LSTR and SURGE are held by a relatively small number accounts. Of the ~300,000 SURGE that have been sold the top 20 holders own ~78%. The distribution for circulating LSTR is similar; the top 20 holders own ~77%.

Essentially LEO holders have purchased more LEO via proxy mechanisms.


A substantial input to the Leo Ecosystem may be diminished as Leo holders move assets outside of Hive. Voting on posts associated with LEO. A substantial portion of HP held by LEO enthusiasts has been powered down and been converted to other assets. If LEO related content is seen as substantially as a net outflow from the Hive economy, then users may be reluctant to assign value (upvote) that content.

The Hive Analytics tool @hiveanalytics from @themarkymark indicates a moderate decline of unique users creating content over the past 30 days. It should be possible to measure the aggregate value of LEO ecosystem curation over the next months and approximate an impact if any.


It will be interesting to see if enthusiasm or interest can be generated in the LeoStrategy tokens outside of the Hive Ecosystem, when liquidity is moved to BASE. Reports today have indicated that LeoStrategy may create a lending platform where users will be able to utilize staked-LEO (sLEO) as collateral for loans. The details of that platform have not yet been definitively detailed, but the mechanism could certainly sequester some significant portion of LEO.



0
0
0.000
10 comments
avatar

Is there any current value being added to Hive from this project anymore?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good question, this would take some effort to answer qualitatively or quantitatively.
Without deeper analysis I would say that many LEO enthusiasts are still Hive enthusiasts.

LEO/InLeo itself appears to have a substantially a Hive external focus, which may correspond better to their overall vision for the future.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They should NOT detach themselves on Hive.
The least they can do is to keep Hive and HBD in their trading platform. Actively trading, swapping with various partner cryptos.

0
0
0.000
avatar

As far I am aware Hive has never been traded on the newest version of LeoDex.io in it's current configuration there is no mechanism to connect through a Hive process like Keychain for instance.

image.png

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yah.
Since they are recipient from Hive Fund, and Hive communities, they should give facility for Hive and HBD to be traded in their CEX/DEX.
We should compel them to do so.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I say this because there are few other words I can use - fantastic analysis.

The outflows may be what is responsible for the recent decline in the value of HIVE - and the decreased activity illustrated by the chart may be a reflection of this.

On another note, I do not know why people conduct technical analysis on HIVE, when it would be (as I said on snaps the other day) trivial to quantitively analyse power down trends, historical patterns of hive outflows, and be able to predict the price within a small margin of error based on those activities.

This of course does not remove external factors such as the inevitable "value in satoshis" that every interconnected crypto has, but it would be one very strong measure at predicting where hive would be going based on flow.

I do not have the energy or motivation to do such an analysis, but I would wager that a fantastic picture of stakeholder's intent and use-cases for hive would be drawn should someone embark on such an exercise.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's not necessarily, this Leo action has had an effect but it's not directly responsible, at its root hive is an inflationary token and the only way it can maintain or grow in value is if more people buy in us getting more people onboarded = more people likely to buy in... Hive has not been growing because we can't onboard people shit quite the opposite many on chain are actively pushing people away

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't disagree, but every variable is a factor.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Totally but with this simple fact and Leo moving to a model that at least appears more sustainable and price starts going crazy it's only natural people are going to move their funds over and it's only going to get worse don't get we wrong Leo is far from perfect I'm just talking about basic market shit people are liable to do

0
0
0.000